Sometimes I get carried away and I can’t seem to stop myself from posting. Other times it seems there are big gaps… And, of course, if I was patient enough to post this tomorrow, it would spread things out a little… But since I’m not, I just want to take this moment to point out a feature or two on Bandcamp that I like.

1. I like the way one can be directed to a customized, tiled list of your music instead of just the most recent upload. The old way made you have to click and scroll too much and that can only lead to carpal tunnel.

http://dmgardnermusic.bandcamp.com (new version)

Assigning an upload to each tile can be annoying (and somewhat time-consuming), but it does let you present your music in whatever way you think is most beneficial. You do, however, have to click the back button to get back to the tiles.

2. I’ve mentioned this before, but I love the customization features available in Bandcamp. I am able to really make it look like an extension of my website by changing backgrounds and so forth.

http://dmgardnermusic.com (example of main site)

3. I love how Bandcamp lets you embed your music across several platforms. Not only that, but you can customize font and background colors, again helping you exactly match it to your site’s theme. I also like the visualizations, which can add a little flare to your example, particularly if it is a midi sample. NOTE: I am only going to use the email version of the link for this next example to see how it posts across platforms. I’ll fix it later, if necessary.

http://dmgardnermusic.bandcamp.com/track/fanfare-alleluia-ssaa?permalink

4. I like how Bandcamp lets you offer your tracks in various ways (free, set your own price, fixed price). For me, this is a little less of a concern, as I am not a band… And most of my music on Bandcamp exists for the purpose of example. To a band, however, these features are invaluable. Bandcamp allows you to download in various higher-res formats too. No low-quality MP3s here (unless you’ve tricked the system and up-converted them).

5. It doesn’t stop there. You can offer bonus downloads such as PDFs, offer physical goods and merchandise, and even provide the UPC code for your new album. Bandcamp can even use your UPC info to relay sales statistics to Nielsen SoundScan,” the company behind the Billboard charts.” You have to admit, that’s pretty cool.

6. OK, now this one is a little weird, but it’s still cool none-the-less. Ever feel the need to play Defender, but don’t own an antique Atari system? Well, you’re in luck! Bandcamp will let you play a cheesy little version of Defender with your statistics! Huh? That’s right. …With your statistics. Just click on “stats,” then on “defender” when logged into your account and let the fun begin! Well, it’s a kinda fun for a few minutes anyway…

7. Given the awesome treasure trove that Bandcamp already offers, I’m sure it does other cool things too… But now I’ve spent too much time writing about them to discover any more of them just yet.

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

Below is a comment posted on one of the other platforms I post to:

(Oops…  The server didn’t like my graphic attachment the first time I tried to post this, so I’ll just post without it and delete the previous one later.  Sorry!!!)

While in the process of updating my subscription options, I realized that some of my feeds were not updating properly.  The problem appears to have been related to a setting in WordPress.  It was set to display 999 of my most recent posts and Feedburner evidently did not like this.  As soon as I changed it to only 10, Feedburner was happy again.  If you have already subscribed to the RSS feed, the address stayed the same and you shouldn’t miss any updates.

But remember, subscribing by email is the way to go.  So, go ahead, it’s easy!

Also, please let me know if you have any email subscription issues or just any feedback in general.  I’m always looking to improve MTT, and the best way to do that is to find out what you would like to read about.

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

I used to use RSS feeds to follow other blogs, and that was working out OK until I realized that I hate using RSS feeds. There were just too many, and I was really only checking a few of them regularly anyway. …Not to mention, life generally provides constant distractions, so before you know it, you’ve missed a lot of stuff that’s been posted.

So now’s your chance! Instead of just waiting around until you happen to remember to look through your RSS feeds, simply enter your email address in the sidebar on the right and click “Subscribe.” Now you can be as lazy as I am and just wait for the information to just flow your way!

Trust me it really is the best way to follow…

Besides, I know you wouldn’t want to miss out on any of the fascinating posts on Music Tech Talk.

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

I was probably more surprised than anyone else… As stated in my previous article regarding the unfortunate post-purchase-pixel-eating-internal-damage-not-covered-by-warranty fiasco, there was just no way that I was going to pay $430 to fix a $500 laptop (after $250 mark-down/price-match). So while HP was in the process of returining the damaged unit, I gave the retailer a call. I calmly explained my situation and to my surprise, they happily agreed to exchange it for an “equivalent” model. I figured I’d end up with a slightly lesser model. Instead, everything fell into place like a dream…

…Or maybe a nightmare. If you recall, I found out that my wife had misplaced the receipt Of course, there was no way they would take it back now.

But when I walked into the customer service portion of the store, everything just seemed to fall into place. The guy I had talked to on phone happened to be standing right there. There were no other customers around and two other available customer service reps. I told them how I had lost the receipt and had only the tag on the box attached to show I wasn’t walking out with a stolen laptop the first time I bought it. Luckily, that had a date on it. So, cheerfully, without even looking at the damaged product, they retrieved a brand-new identical model from the back… New-in-the-box! The laptop I had purchased was a floor model with only the power chord. To put a little icing on the cake, I now have a brand new receipt and a warranty that starts yesterday. Although, if the LCD screen has another issue I’m pretty sure I won’t be mailing it to HP to get it fixed. With that being said, call me crazy, but I still didn’t purchase the extended warranty. 

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

FINAL UPDATE:  Clearly, pasting from word improved things like text formatting.  Text colors, for example seem to be working now.  There seems to be something in particular about this post that is making Posterous insist on placing the “inline” pics at the end…  If you look at previous posts, you will note that they are properly placed.  I forgot to add the YouTube link for the last iteration of this post, so that was obviously not what caused the problem.  If the pics place properly this time, I tried separating them with text…  Other than that, there are a few challenges to overcome when posting via email, but generally it’s not too problematic.  Figuring out the little quirks is half the fun.

UPDATE TO POST ATTEMPT: It was inevitable that something would not post correctly since this was a live test… In this case, the text colors did not work. Also, while the inline photos did not post as a gallery, they also did not post in the correct position within the post… That is usually not an issue. Not sure what caused that problem, but it may have been that I typed this post entirely in Thunderbird, rather than pasting from Word. Finally, adding tags within the Posterous email was NOT successful… My guess is that they only work when using the post by email feature provided by WordPress. Oh well. I guess I’ll just have to add tags manually for now. I have re-posted the same thing, but started in Word this time and pasted into Thunderbird to see if there is any difference. Below is the original content.

Unfortunately, every now and then the only way to really test a feature is to use it live.  At the bottom of every post you will note that it says the post was posted by Posterous, a handy post-by-email blog utility.  So far, I have been very happy with the results.  It is amazingly simple, posts across multiple platforms and does so relatively consistently and intuitively.  Posterous, is however, not my actual blog.  Sure, I formatted it to kind of mirror my actual blog (self-hosted WordPress), but really I use it because of its email posting capabilities.  It interfaces nicely with Facebook too, as a separate tab.  Ironically, exponentially more people seem to read my blog via Posterous than my actual blog, but since I like the way WordPress looks and acts, I prefer WP to be my blog’s home.

Here’s an example of some generally successful formatting.  This should be green, bold, italic, and centered.

Next, just by posting the LINK (much easier this way, because Posterous decides which platforms need which format), not the embedded HTML, you should see a YouTube video about some kid getting his finger bitten by his little brother with over 175 million views (why?).  By link, I mean just the web address at the top of your browser.  Yeah, it’s that easy.

Next, you should see some inline pics.  In other words, they are just inserted into the body of the post.  Some services will put multiple pics into a gallery, and just one pic inline.  Posterous does this as a matter of fact.  I don’t like it.  Don’t worry though, if you use WordPress, the pics will still post inline, even if Posterous doesn’t.

Here are those two Pics.  I’ll try to have them centered and will resize one of them by dragging.  Some services will let you click on the images to see the full-size version.  Others will not.  Facebook will generally use them as thumbnails, which is nice.

THIS PARAGRAPH FOR FACEBOOK USER INFO ONLY:  Facebook is a terribly buggy platform and will handle pics differently depending on how many there are in your post.  Just one pic is great.  You’ll get a thumbnail followed by a snippet of your post.  More than that, and it has been posting just thumbnails with nothing else.  I have to put a link in the comments below them.  Strangely, those comments repeat themselves every time I post this way.  I think it’s actually another Facebook bug, but in this one instance it at least saves me from having to re-type the comment.  Even more strange is the fact that a fan page will post it correctly, but the regular interface will not… At least they are consistent… Follow these links to see a fan page example: Fan Page ).

TIP:  When posting by email using Mozilla Thunderbird, make sure you remember to select “Rich Text” (HTML) only under “Options” before you hit send.  If you forget and send the message with mixed plain and rich text, your post formatting gets all squirrelly.

Some things like emoticons (if you are into that sort of thing) are more hit-and-miss.      (typed in) :-[ (pre-formatted by email client).  It usually works best for me to write the post in Microsoft Word, images and all, then paste into Thunderbird (Pics, YouTube links, regular links and visual formatting).

However, there is one particularly annoying quirk that I would like to overcome.

Unfortunately, the way Posterous handles tags only works with Posterous.  Everything else may post perfectly on other platforms, but none of them will have tags or categories other whatever your defaults are set to.  This problem makes search engines useless unless you go back and add them in…  Which, of course, wastes time and defeats the purpose of posting across multiple platforms.  So, when formatting the title, the email subject is the title.  This is how you format the tags in Posterous:  Title of Your Post ((tag:  tag, post, blog, tips, wordpress, post+by+email))

Whatever you do, DON’T FORGET THE OPENING OR CLOSING PARENTHESIS which look like this:   ((     ))  If you do forget, your post title will include a long list of tags.  Very unsightly.  The thing is, if you are posting across multiple platforms, as I do, mistakes can be VERY time consuming to fix.  Overall, I don’t have too many issues…  This problem can be easily prevented, if you just remember to give it a quick glance before hitting send.

Making tags post on other platforms, however, is a different story…  So this post will itself be a test of a work around.  You can tell Posterous not to post anything beyond a pound sign followed by the word end (look for an explanation under “What Else Can Posterous Do?”  I would show you of course, but then nothing else would post afterward…  Annoyingly enough, I think you will see the shortcut at the bottom of this post…  BEFORE that shortcut, I will put in just a couple shortcuts that WordPress recognizes to see what happens.  Normally, I suppose I would put these just before the end of the post, so as not to make them too distracting, but for example I’ll put them here.  Also, I’ll put a duplicate set using asterisks instead of brackets for the WordPress sites so you can still see them:

NON WORDPRESS SITES SHOULD STILL BE ABLE TO SEE THESE UNLESS CONFUSED WITH SOME OTHER KIND OF SHORTCUT, I SUPPOSE
[category Blogging, internet, posted by email, reviews, websites, technology, online utilities, tips, wordpress]
[tags test post, formatting, post+by+email, posterous, wordpress, tips]

DUPLICATE SET FOR WORDPRESS SITES:
*category Blogging, internet, posted by email, reviews, websites, technology, online utilities, tips, wordpress*
*tags test post, formatting, post+by+email, posterous, wordpress, tips*These are specifically WordPress.com shortcuts.  I don’t know how the self-hosted version of WP will handle them.  As I said, this is a live experiment.  If you want to see if this worked, here are the appropriate links:  Main Blog (self-hosted WordPress); WordPress.com Version

In case you are wondering, I post simultaneously to over 15 platforms including several blog and social networking services.  Why, you ask?  Because I can…  And because, it’s an interesting way to try out multiple features and services at the same time.  Some of them are better at getting search engine placement, others have better templates or better interfaces.  Other than that, it’s just good, clean fun.

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

UPDATE TO POST ATTEMPT: It was inevitable that something would not post correctly since this was a live test… In this case, the text colors did not work. Also, while the inline photos did not post as a gallery, they also did not post in the correct position within the post… That is usually not an issue. Not sure what caused that problem, but it may have been that I typed this post entirely in Thunderbird, rather than pasting from Word. Finally, adding tags within the Posterous email was NOT successful… My guess is that they only work when using the post by email feature provided by WordPress. Oh well. I guess I’ll just have to add tags manually for now. I have re-posted the same thing, but started in Word this time and pasted into Thunderbird to see if there is any difference. Below is the original content.

Unfortunately, every now and then the only way to really test a feature is to use it live.  At the bottom of every post you will note that it says the post was posted by Posterous, a handy post-by-email blog utility.  So far, I have been very happy with the results.  It is amazingly simple, posts across multiple platforms and does so relatively consistently and intuitively.  Posterous, is however, not my actual blog.  Sure, I formatted it to kind of mirror my actual blog (self-hosted WordPress), but really I use it because of its email posting capabilities.  It interfaces nicely with Facebook too, as a separate tab.  Ironically, exponentially more people seem to read my blog via Posterous than my actual blog, but since I like the way WordPress looks and acts, I prefer WP to be my blog’s home.

Here’s an example of some generally successful formatting.  This should be green, bold, italic, and centered.

Next, just by posting the LINK (much easier this way, because Posterous decides which platforms need which format), not the embedded HTML, you should see a YouTube video about some kid getting his finger bitten by his little brother with over 175 million views (why?).  By link, I mean just the web address at the top of your browser.  Yeah, it’s that easy.

Next, you should see some inline pics.  In other words, they are just inserted into the body of the post.  Some services will put multiple pics into a gallery, and just one pic inline.  Posterous does this as a matter of fact.  I don’t like it.  Don’t worry though, if you use WordPress, the pics will still post inline, even if Posterous doesn’t.

Here are those two Pics.  I’ll try to have them centered and will resize one of them by dragging.  Some services will let you click on the images to see the full-size version.  Others will not.  Facebook will generally use them as thumbnails, which is nice.

THIS PARAGRAPH FOR FACEBOOK USER INFO ONLY:  Facebook is a terribly buggy platform and will handle pics differently depending on how many there are in your post.  Just one pic is great.  You’ll get a thumbnail followed by a snippet of your post.  More than that, and it has been posting just thumbnails with nothing else.  I have to put a link in the comments below them.  Strangely, those comments repeat themselves every time I post this way.  I think it’s actually another Facebook bug, but in this one instance it at least saves me from having to re-type the comment.  Even more strange is the fact that a fan page will post it correctly, but the regular interface will not… At least they are consistent… Follow these links to see a fan page example: Fan Page ).

TIP:  When posting by email using Mozilla Thunderbird, make sure you remember to select “Rich Text” (HTML) only under “Options” before you hit send.  If you forget and send the message with mixed plain and rich text, your post formatting gets all squirrelly.

Some things like emoticons (if you are into that sort of thing) are more hit-and-miss.        (typed in) :-[ :-\ :-* (pre-formatted by email client).  It usually works best for me to write the post in Microsoft Word, images and all, then paste into Thunderbird (Pics, YouTube links, regular links and visual formatting).

However, there is one particularly annoying quirk that I would like to overcome.

Unfortunately, the way Posterous handles tags only works with Posterous.  Everything else may post perfectly on other platforms, but none of them will have tags or categories other whatever your defaults are set to.  This problem makes search engines useless unless you go back and add them in…  Which, of course, wastes time and defeats the purpose of posting across multiple platforms.  So, when formatting the title, the email subject is the title.  This is how you format the tags in Posterous:  Title of Your Post ((tag:  tag, post, blog, tips, wordpress, post+by+email))

Whatever you do, DON’T FORGET THE OPENING OR CLOSING PARENTHESIS which look like this:   ((     ))  If you do forget, your post title will include a long list of tags.  Very unsightly.  The thing is, if you are posting across multiple platforms, as I do, mistakes can be VERY time consuming to fix.  Overall, I don’t have too many issues…  This problem can be easily prevented, if you just remember to give it a quick glance before hitting send.

Making tags post on other platforms, however, is a different story…  So this post will itself be a test of a work around.  You can tell Posterous not to post anything beyond a pound sign followed by the word end (look for an explanation under “What Else Can Posterous Do?”  I would show you of course, but then nothing else would post afterward…  Annoyingly enough, I think you will see the shortcut at the bottom of this post…  BEFORE that shortcut, I will put in just a couple shortcuts that WordPress recognizes to see what happens.  Normally, I suppose I would put these just before the end of the post, so as not to make them too distracting, but for example I’ll put them here.  Also, I’ll put a duplicate set using asterisks instead of brackets for the WordPress sites so you can still see them:

NON WORDPRESS SITES SHOULD STILL BE ABLE TO SEE THESE UNLESS CONFUSED WITH SOME OTHER KIND OF SHORTCUT, I SUPPOSE
[category Blogging, internet, posted by email, reviews, websites, technology, online utilities, tips, wordpress]
[tags test post, formatting, post+by+email, posterous, wordpress, tips]

DUPLICATE SET FOR WORDPRESS SITES:
*category Blogging, internet, posted by email, reviews, websites, technology, online utilities, tips, wordpress*
*tags test post, formatting, post+by+email, posterous, wordpress, tips*These are specifically WordPress.com shortcuts.  I don’t know how the self-hosted version of WP will handle them.  As I said, this is a live experiment.  If you want to see if this worked, here are the appropriate links:  Main Blog (self-hosted WordPress); WordPress.com Version

In case you are wondering, I post simultaneously to over 15 platforms including several blog and social networking services.  Why, you ask?  Because I can…  And because, it’s an interesting way to try out multiple features and services at the same time.  Some of them are better at getting search engine placement, others have better templates or better interfaces.  Other than that, it’s just good, clean fun.

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

Here’s an example of some generally successful formatting.  This should be green, bold, italic, and centered.

Next, just by posting the LINK (much easier this way, because Posterous decides which platforms need which format), not the embedded HTML, you should see a YouTube video about some kid getting his finger bitten by his little brother with over 175 million views (why?).  By link, I mean just the web address at the top of your browser.  Yeah, it’s that easy.

Next, you should see some inline pics.  In other words, they are just inserted into the body of the post.  Some services will put multiple pics into a gallery, and just one pic inline.  Posterous does this as a matter of fact.  I don’t like it.  Don’t worry though, if you use WordPress, the pics will still post inline, even if Posterous doesn’t.
Here are those two Pics.  I’ll try to have them centered and will resize one of them by dragging.  Some services will let you click on the images to see the full-size version.  Others will not.  Facebook will generally use them as thumbnails, which is nice.

THIS PARAGRAPH FOR FACEBOOK USER INFO ONLY:  Facebook is a terribly buggy platform and will handle pics differently depending on how many there are in your post.  Just one pic is great.  You’ll get a thumbnail followed by a snippet of your post.  More than that, and it has been posting just thumbnails with nothing else.  I have to put a link in the comments below them.  Strangely, those comments repeat themselves every time I post this way.  I think it’s actually another Facebook bug, but in this one instance it at least saves me from having to re-type the comment.  Even more strange is the fact that a fan page will post it correctly, but the regular interface will not… At least they are consistent… Follow these links to see a fan page example: Fan Page ).

TIP:  When posting by email using Mozilla Thunderbird, make sure you remember to select “Rich Text” (HTML) only under “Options” before you hit send.  If you forget and send the message with mixed plain and rich text, your post formatting gets all squirrelly.

Some things like emoticons (if you are into that sort of thing) are more hit-and-miss.        (typed in) :-$ (pre-formatted by email client).  It usually works best for me to write the post in Microsoft Word, images and all, then paste into Thunderbird (Pics, YouTube links, regular links and visual formatting).

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

And they all lived happily ever after…  NOPE!

Huh?  Yeah, you read right…  Eating itself.  In fact I would describe it as a growing ink blot.  First a pixel or two, then 50, then thousands!  I had never seen anything like it.  Don’t worry though, because that superhero called Mr. Warranty was still protecting us, if not the store post 14 days.  I looked up HP’s generous pixel policy and decided that there would be no problem getting it serviced.  Then I discovered that my wife had lost the receipt and that the store only keeps receipt records for two weeks (sounds like bull to me).   :’( …But then my wife miraculously found the receipt in the back of our stroller.  Duh, I mean that’s where everything we can’t find ends up.  Once, I couldn’t find one of my kids…  Guess where they were…  Just kidding…  Turns out HP didn’t even need the receipt anyway!!!   Shoot, HP even sent me a shipping box free of charge.  Their customer service was top-notch….

Apparently there was some sort of internal crack in the LCD screen that was gradually exposing pixels to oxygen, which is what makes them turn inky-black.  I can’t possibly see how this was anything but an obvious manufacturing defect, but they refused to service it none-the-less… That is, unless I was going to fork over $430!  Aaaaah, HP, I hate to tell you this, but I bought the thing for $500…  Oh, and I’d rather hack off the LCD screen and just plug in an external monitor than pay you $430 to fix a manufacturer’s defect that should be covered under warranty.

I decided to call the store, even though 2 months have elapsed, and very calmly and politely explained the situation asking “if there was any recourse.”  To my surprise and delight, the store has agreed to replace the computer with an equivalent model!  Wow, what a relief….

Wait for it….   My wife lost the receipt again!  Unfortunately, it is nowhere to be found this time.  Personally, I think one of the kids ate it.

So, in a day or two, when we get our laptop back, I guess we are going to hope that a credit card purchase statement will be good enough for the store to go ahead and still replace the model.  Otherwise, I’ll be stopping by Lowe’s soon to pick up a hatchet and maybe Best Buy for a cheap monitor.  I don’t even know if there is an appropriate emoticon for that…

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous

My brand-new (well, very slightly used) Yamaha Xeno 8335S!

That’s a stock photo above, but it looks identical to mine. I got a great deal on eBay, paying about 1/3 of the ridiculously high list price of $2,884 for a new one. Online, they seem to range from around $1,900 to $2,100 brand new. The local store wanted 2,400+ (which, in the interest of supporting local business, I actually considered), but reconsidered after learning the following three facts:

1) They didn’t have a rent-to-own program for this trumpet

2) Yamaha offered a credit line with an interest rate that could put a small company out of business… Oh, and I happen to think credit is akin to being shackled to a sinking ship. Oh, and by the time you paid off the interest, you’d be paying as much as or more for the trumpet than the list price!

3) They didn’t carry in stock the model that I ended-up purchasing, thus I couldn’t try it out.

In case you were wondering, the trumpet is near mint, no scratches, no dings. The valves are in spectacular condition. The case, also in excellent condition, was included. A Harmon mute and two straight mutes were included, along with some valve oil, slide grease and several polishing cloths. Another handy addition was the collapsible bell stand (the kind that fits in the bell). Very cool. For a little icing on the cake, I didn’t realize that the stock gold-rimmed 1 ½ equivalent Yamaha mouthpiece was included, as the description left this fact out. Normally, I wouldn’t care, but in this case I actually wanted to give it a shot. It was also in mint condition.

To be continued… 

Musical Injuries Series – Methods of Recovery Post VI

Posted via email from Music Tech Talk on Posterous